Weber's Cosmos:
Weber's Cataclysmic Collision Theory and Other Ideas .
Austin I. Weber..

:: home :: theory :: other writings :: e-mail  

OXYGEN STARVATION :: THE ENERGY CRISIS :: NEGLECT OF DUTY :: ECONOMIC REALITY :: MARIE ANTOINETTE SYNDROME ::
DIRECTED MOTION :: US Sanctioning Slavery :: Survival will Require Drastic Change :: Questioning Religion ::
letter to Prof. Urry, Yale University :: Revival of the Great Depression ::


Mr. Austin I. Weber

24 July 2007

Professor Meg Urry
Yale University

Dear Professor Urry:

I find you work about dark energy very interesting.  However, science needs answers to many questions which it is not getting from the Big Bang Singularity, Super String, dark energy or expanding universe.  Below I shall pose some of the questions that need answers.

It has never been my belief that space is limited to the universe or that God created man.  To me, logic would dictate that space would be infinite in what I call the cosmos, and life forms could be produced in the cooling process of very hot planets.  These would have atmospheres as first described in Appendix 40 of Weber’s Cataclysmic Collision Theory, and as further described in this letter.

In 1996, I started writing my first theory, Weber’s Cataclysmic Collision Theory, and then, Directed Motion as a Source of Life.  My first theory has been published and re-published in the international physics journal, Acta Ciencia Indica Vol. XXIX, No. 1, 2003 and Vol. XXXI, No. 4, 2005.  I also have a website, www.weberscosmos.com, where my scientific writings and other papers appear.

If the cosmos is infinite, as I believe, then what we call the universe would be smaller than an electron in size.  In that case, the Big Bang Singularity and the universe expansion would be of little significance.

The following questions have yet to be answered:

  1. How were atoms formed?
  2. Where did sub-atomic particles come from?
  3. How did the elements come about and what is their order of abundance?
  4. How did compounds in the form of minerals come about?
  5. How did stars form?
  6. How did galaxies form?
  7. Why should these be orbiting among stars and planets?
  8. What is the significance of Einstein’s Worm Holes and how were they formed?
  9. Why was matter formed when the Big Bang entity exploded or imploded?
    1. When this phenomenon occurred why was the force just right so that the dispersion was not completely dispersed nor recondensed upon itself?
    2. In a radial dispersion how did orbiting happen, compounds form and stars and galaxies form?
  10. In a radial dispersion of great force would not everything expand, and probably at a fairly constant velocity?
  11. In a Big Bang entity with its massive density and gravitational force, how could any structured atom exist, and in discrete concentrations and variety?
  12. Why is a Titan moon composed essentially of methane and ice?
  13. Why are hydrogen and helium the most abundant elements?

Regarding our earth, there is a separate group of questions that remains unanswered:

  1. Why do we have oceans and seas?
  2. Why are these waters saline?
  3. Why do we have large amounts of silicon dioxide?
  4. Why is aluminum a very prevalent element?
  5. Why are there discrete deposits of various minerals?
  6. Why is our air composed mainly of 75.6% nitrogen and 23.1% oxygen?
  7. Why do we have a large variety of insects, animals, fish, bacteria, various microscopic living forms, a diversity of plant life, etc.?

There are so many questions, but no scientific answers.  We simply say that God created heaven and earth, made woman from a rib of Adam, and did everything in six days.  We do not do any better with the Big Bang Singularity, Super String or Dark Energy.  Are we any better off now than in our previous beliefs – the world is flat and the sun revolves around the earth?

Isn’t it time that we face scientific realism?  Scientist have known for a fact that no God did all these wonderful things, but having no logical answers for how they came about, they were willing to accept God.  The answers to all the questions are logically provided within Weber’s Cataclysmic Collision Theory.

Directed Motion as a Source of Life indicates how molecular motion could eventually lead to life forms.  As an example, I used amino acid polymerization as a starting point, but in no way should it be limited to just amino acids.  Many different compounds could form in the isolated waters that would accumulate.

In order to explain what I believe was earth’s beginning and the early vestiges of life, further details are needed.  From my theory, the opposing dispersions (exo-enermats) and subsequent accumulations after the cataclysmic collision, would first produce two enermatias.  Then there would be orbiting of stars around each of the enermatias to produce two galaxies.  Many of the stars would have orbiting planets.  Earth, being one of these planets, would be extremely hot as would the exo-enermats and earth’s atmosphere.
The initial atmospheric elements, in order of their abundance, would consist of hydrogen, helium, lithium, beryllium, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, fluorine, neon, sodium, magnesium, etc.  Many compounds, in the same order of abundance, would be methane, ammonia, water, hydrogen, fluoride, carbon dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, sodium oxide, sodium chloride, etc.

For a considerable period of time, the sun’s rays would not be able to penetrate earth’s dense atmosphere, and its surface would remain dark.  Cooling by radiation would eventually lower the temperature of both the earth’s atmosphere and its surface so that rain would pour down.  Because of the density of the atmosphere, water would boil in excess of 100ºC so that the rain and resulting pools and lakes would be extremely hot.  With rains being a constant occurrence, many of the atmospheric components would be carried into the isolated pools and lakes.  These would eventually become the incubators for a great variety of life forms.

I am enclosing copies of Weber’s Cataclysmic Collision Theory and Directed Motion as a source of Life.  Because I have gone into rather lengthy detail, I intend to put this letter on my website and include it in my future mailings to fellow scientists.

I would greatly appreciate hearing from you and receiving your comments and thoughts.

Very truly yours,

Austin I. Weber