|
Table 1
Mathematical Calculations for
Additional Mass that Could be Created at Various Velocities at Collision
Velocity at Contact (cm/sec) |
Kinetic Energy (ergs) |
Matter Created (in grams) |
% Mass Created Compared to Mass of Two Milky Ways |
Maximum
Total Mass in the Two
Exo-enermats
(in grams) |
6.00 x 1010 (100%) |
7.20 x 1065 |
8.00 x 1044 g |
200.00 % |
1.20 x 1045 g |
5.40 x 1010 (90%) |
5.83 x 1065 |
6.48 x 1044 g |
162.00 % |
1.05 x 1045 g |
4.80 x 1010 (80%) |
4.61 x 1065 |
5.12 x 1044 g |
128.00 % |
9.12 x 1044 g |
4.20 x 1010 (70%) |
3.53 x 1065 |
3.92 x 1044 g |
98.00 % |
7.92 x 1044 g |
3.60 x 1010 (60%) |
2.69 x 1065 |
2.99 x 1044 g |
74.75% |
6.99 x 1044 g |
3.00 x 1010 (50%) |
1.80 x 1065 |
2.00 x 1044 g |
50.00 % |
6.00 x 1044 g |
After the collision the expanding exo-enermat traveling at prodigious velocities in two opposing (essentially) cylindrical paths, parallel to the direction from which the enermatias arrived would consist of particles and unchanged enermat. Shortly after the initial particles are formed, interaction takes place producing new particles and eventually, atoms.
The idea that the predominant exo-enermat would be concentrated in two more or less cylindrical paths rather than a radial dispersion, would tend to help eventually in the formation of larger bodies, orbiting bodies and absorption of stray particles.
Unlike the Big Bang Singularity, Weber’s Cataclysmic Collisions are infinite in number. It is postulated by some that space is finite to which I can in no way agree, and in this regard I would like to give universe and cosmos a more distinctive definition. I think of Universe as encompassing only those bodies visible with optical telescopes, while Cosmos represents the infinite. |
